At the beginning of the 20th century, both the political and academic worlds talked about who owned the land or ice in the Arctic and, by extension, the resources there. By that time, most people thought of the Arctic as a region that didn’t have any control over it yet and could therefore be occupied. A significant body of political and academic opinion supports the application of the UNCLOS to the Arctic due to its comprehensive nature Nursing essay writers UK. This view is partly grounded in the convention’s provision treating frozen seas akin to other bodies of water. However, this provision primarily addresses environmental protection rather than territorial claims. Historically, the early 20th century was marked by intense debates over Arctic sovereignty and resource ownership, reflecting a prevailing perception of the region as an unoccupied territory ripe for exploitation.